I’m
sure you know how sometimes someone can say just that thing that clicks
and changes the way you see and do everything. I had such an encounter early in
my teaching career. We were in the beginning of a five-year curriculum revision
cycle (my first), and my then-English department chair casually observed that
there was a difference between giving a writing assignment and teaching
writing.
Not
all writing instruction is created equal, however, and I found myself nodding
like a bobblehead while reading this article in Ed Week/Teacher.
In a study just published in the School
Psychology Review, researchers Gary A. Trioa and Natalie G. Olinghouse
summarize these essential evidence-based practices for teaching writing,
including: daily writing practice, strategy instruction, self-regulation and
meta-cognitive reflection (as in the Self-Regulated Strategy Development
approach), peer collaboration, and regular feedback through formative
assessment. Unfortunately, the study concludes that most schools do not have
sufficiently comprehensive, sustained, and focused systems [emphasis mine]
for offering professional development to teachers to support such writing
practices.
A
“comprehensive, sustained, and focused system” of writing instruction is
precisely what College and Career Readiness: Writing offers. We know
that a change in method and intent is not a superficial thing, and any call for
teachers and students to work differently and for different ends must come with
an offer of assistance. And we are here—ready, willing, and able to help you
make that challenging transition.
Photo by Amrbo Courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Photo by Amrbo Courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
No comments:
Post a Comment